<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Ergonomics Real Design - Latest Comments</title><link>http://realdesignexhibition.disqus.com/</link><description>The Ergonomics - Real Design Exhibition is an exhibition showcasing how Ergonomics and Human Factors are making things better all around us. It features at The Design Museum in London between November 2009 and March 2010.</description><atom:link href="https://realdesignexhibition.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:23:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Examples of Poor Design&amp;#8230;are occasions to learn&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.realworlddesign.org/blog/blog/2008/11/23/examples-of-poor-designare-occasions-to-learn/#comment-68777294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thinking on, the notch would also prevent a visitor from storing the keycard in their wallet. That would -actually- make it poorly designed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MileHighSi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:23:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Examples of Poor Design&amp;#8230;are occasions to learn&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.realworlddesign.org/blog/blog/2008/11/23/examples-of-poor-designare-occasions-to-learn/#comment-68775822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I completely disagree. The keycard works and the instructions are clear enough. You can go too far with instructions - and assumptions that humans can't figure stuff out (see. instructions on hand dryers). Of course, this is assuming that whoever gives a visitor the keycard fails to tell them how to use it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, if you're going to put a notch on the keycard to indicate which side up the card should be inserted, it should be on the bottom to allow more room for your instructions on the top.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Same goes for CDs, bank debit cards, etc etc.. do you think all of these need re-designing?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Out of interest, do you have any proof that there was no user testing done, or that anybody has actually had a problem?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MileHighSi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:10:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Examples of Poor Design&amp;#8230;are occasions to learn&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.realworlddesign.org/blog/blog/2008/11/23/examples-of-poor-designare-occasions-to-learn/#comment-68774841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I completely disagree&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MileHighSi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 18:59:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ergonomics: Process + People &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.realworlddesign.org/blog/2009/10/05/ergonomics-process-people/#comment-18550594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks so much for linking to this article. I'm glad you like it! - Paul&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul (from Idea Sandbox)</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 06:08:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ergonomically Designed!</title><link>http://www.realworlddesign.org/blog/blog/2009/02/19/ergonomically-designed/#comment-10303106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you are right Duncan, a 'certified ergonomic' stamp is a great idea particularly as an extension of the existing Ergonomics Society (or IEHF) accreditation scheme. Has something like this ever been attempted in the past?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hcdi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:56:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ergonomically Designed!</title><link>http://www.realworlddesign.org/blog/blog/2009/02/19/ergonomically-designed/#comment-10303105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Spot on. It's time we as ergonomists started to take some 'ownership' of our discipline. Until we have in place an official Ergonomics society (or IEHF) 'stamp' on a product to confirm it is 'ergonomically designed' the phrase will remain just one of many standard lines that can stated by marketing men. The result is those products which have genuinely had ergo input being lost amongst the plefora of those which have not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Duncan Robertson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:35:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About Us</title><link>http://www.realworlddesign.org/blog#comment-10303097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a very timely question - there's a relatively recent movement in the field towards 'neuroergonomics', being led by one of the eminent names in ergonomics, Raja Parasuraman (see &lt;a href="http://archlab.gmu.edu/people/rparasur/Neuroergonomics.htm)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://archlab.gmu.edu/people/rparasur/Neuroergonomics.htm)"&gt;http://archlab.gmu.edu/peop...&lt;/a&gt;.  This is about using neuroscience measures for ergonomic applications - such as attention or mental workload in complex systems design - and is very much influenced by the psychological side of ergonomics.  My feeling is that this will be a growth area, as engineers and designers increasingly turn to ergonomists for quantifiable measures of performance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Young</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:29:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About Us</title><link>http://www.realworlddesign.org/blog#comment-10303096</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a lay person I'm interested to learn how neuroscience has 'interfaced' with real world ergonomic design - that is, to what extent do our neurological processes shape ergonomic design?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Helen Charman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:31:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>